Jump to content

Lucy Collett (Page 3 Girl)


WJones

Recommended Posts

 

11 minutes ago, Mike Rotch said:

Hypothetical to illustrate my point:  A football player is mc'ing a charity auction.  Is that an appropriate time to throw a ball at him, expecting him to kick it?  Obviously not.

So if the footballer loses his shit and ends the mc’ing as a reaction to the thrown ball this helps the auction go well? 

But you just made him up, the Lucy example has actually happened.507B2203-7C8E-40B1-AB48-3614DAFD6057.thumb.png.9069b2cb505063a61c3c081ae9b08507.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Forum Lurker

I think she may be trying to broaden what she's known for by doing things such as twitch and charity work, perhaps be seen a lil more respectfully? Might explain why she got a lil pissy.

Thing is I do think it's a bit naive to expect people to not treat her as the arguably very well known figure she's become. Do other things sure, but these "sex pests" are actually her own fans who only enjoy her for what she's known for doing. Can't get annoyed at them for suggesting she does what she's known for always doing

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, spaceboy said:

You’re right: she was upset because two fans asked her to take her clothes off; why would they think she would do that?

VIXENSHIRT_05A1783.thumb.jpg.01607c9c87fc1e9aa2310aa2580e673c.jpg  1,162   146.83 kB

She was in a dressing gown at the time

B78C6383-2DEB-473D-9EF4-2770CDCE657C.thumb.jpeg.c719aa04bf66581cc0356c3d66bdd3e6.jpeg  1,338   25.78 kB

IMG_0786.thumb.jpg.e9e572c47fa54f207962b84743af50cd.jpg  2,422   131.01 kB like this one.

 

if she was in her dressing gown, then I think it would be a fair assumption that she would (pardon the pun) disrobe at some point

it's one of those things where both sides were in the wrong, lucy overreacting but the catalyst was being asked to do what she wasnt planning to.

i think in general if a girls doing a live stream of any sort they tend to get asked to strip.

but, as it was apparently for a kids charity, she had a right to get angry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Chocobogamer said:

if she was in her dressing gown, then I think it would be a fair assumption that she would (pardon the pun) disrobe at some point

it's one of those things where both sides were in the wrong, lucy overreacting but the catalyst was being asked to do what she wasnt planning to.

i think in general if a girls doing a live stream of any sort they tend to get asked to strip.

but, as it was apparently for a kids charity, she had a right to get angry.

its not a children's charity; its for disabled gamers of any age. the issue here is she let her guard down and revealed what she actually thinks about all of us and her fans; 'sex pests'; judging us but of course always desperate to take our dollars so she doesn't have to do a job.

xueg1WN.thumb.jpg.899e77e5e3213e6aea7ad4da3f685f6f.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, spaceboy said:

its not a children's charity; its for disabled gamers of any age. the issue here is she let her guard down and revealed what she actually thinks about all of us and her fans; 'sex pests'; judging us but of course always desperate to take our dollars so she doesn't have to do a job.

The charity is principally focused on children, as indicated by their website.  As to the "sex pests" comment, I am sure she was referring to those couple of fans who were bothering her, not to the whole of her fans in general.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest jbband1

Maybe she overreacted, maybe she didn't. However being a nude model for the majority of her income, doesn't mean she DESERVES to have that bleed into every other part of her life. Maybe she shouldn't have been surprised by it, but there is a time and place for that sort of thing. And those fans definitely picked the wrong time. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, jbband1 said:

Maybe she overreacted, maybe she didn't. However being a nude model for the majority of her income, doesn't mean she DESERVES to have that bleed into every other part of her life. Maybe she shouldn't have been surprised by it, but there is a time and place for that sort of thing. And those fans definitely picked the wrong time. 

 

Think this is basically what i was trying to say, but this is much better put

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, spaceboy said:

its not a children's charity; its for disabled gamers of any age. the issue here is she let her guard down and revealed what she actually thinks about all of us and her fans; 'sex pests'; judging us but of course always desperate to take our dollars so she doesn't have to do a job.

xueg1WN.thumb.jpg.899e77e5e3213e6aea7ad4da3f685f6f.jpg  1,583   241.86 kB

i think you're making much more of it than necessary. Very loosely take the "i didnt do it" simpsons episode, where bart tries to do an interview where he talks about other things but is told to just say the line, then put Lucy into that position, shes doing something different but told to get naked. Like i say, loose link but it must get a bit annoying

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/23/2018 at 12:58 PM, spaceboy said:

She was doing a live video obstensibly to appeal for a very worthy gaming charity.

one or 2 loyal fans suggested she disrobe at which point she lost her shit and ended the transmission calling the fans ‘sex pests’

if it were not for said ‘pests’ she would have no income!

F026FB0A-7E3E-46D2-A9A5-D51F47DE007F.thumb.png.8d582567cbcd40c5bc29b6278b134ae2.png  2,479   511.54 kB

has she ever exploited men by producing non stop fapping material and making money from it?

 Well...........

 

LOL you're pathetic. It's not that I disagree with the overall thrust of your argument, that she should probably expect creeps to show when she does something online considering what her online presence consists primarily of. She should probably have thicker skin or whatever, who cares.  What cracks me up though, is the way you're like defending these knuckle dragging creeps.  Just because it's foreseeable that they'd show up, doesn't make them any less anti-social morons worthy of derision. 

The fact that you claim that she exploited men by producing porn is just about dumbest, most pathetic fucking take I've ever heard in my life.  You feel "exploited" because someone else made a porno and charged money to see it?  LOL.  Fuck.  If you don't want to buy, don't buy it, no one is exploiting you, you dumbass. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Pinus_strobus
On 2/18/2018 at 10:17 AM, ancientjb said:

Does anyone know what her current weight is?

According the Social Glamour site (www.socialglamour.com) she is 5'6" and 196 lbs. I just got a membership there, and I don't know how recently that was updated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Pinus_strobus
On 2/7/2018 at 10:27 PM, someone145 said:

Another example of her being out of her prime. She is starting to look out of focus in vids.

 

I just recently became a member at Social Glamour <www.socialglamour.com> . I am downloading lots of videos and photos from photo-shoots. Not watched many of the videos yet, but but to me she looks more beautiful, more at peace with herself, and happier in the more recent videos and photo-shoots.  I would not say her weight gain is that fast (consider that Erin Green of Jeff's Models <www.jeffsmodels.com> gained about 100 lbs in about 1 year. Erin is a different sort of gal (does hardcore,  and does not fit the 'glamour' idea, but very beautiful in her own right).  But the weight makes her look all the more fabulous in those three ways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, islanders said:

LOL you're pathetic. It's not that I disagree with the overall thrust of your argument, that she should probably expect creeps to show when she does something online considering what her online presence consists primarily of. She should probably have thicker skin or whatever, who cares.  What cracks me up though, is the way you're like defending these knuckle dragging creeps.  Just because it's foreseeable that they'd show up, doesn't make them any less anti-social morons worthy of derision. 

The fact that you claim that she exploited men by producing porn is just about dumbest, most pathetic fucking take I've ever heard in my life.  You feel "exploited" because someone else made a porno and charged money to see it?  LOL.  Fuck.  If you don't want to buy, don't buy it, no one is exploiting you, you dumbass. 

all right mate calm down ; so you agree with me in parts but not others; fair enough; no need to get abusive

i was just making the point that dismissing the fans as 'sex pests' when they pay the lady seemed a bit much...her statement was general to everyone on the feed not just at the morons...and im not defending them,  just seems ironic to bite the hand that feeds you. 

3883AD83-1742-4833-B292-2C4A36750852.thumb.png.233232379af08d39893e040d3655bd36.png

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.