SayHelloToMyLittleFriend

Supposing this were true, it would still have to show evidence that it exists, even if we allow the fanciful idea that we can't know how or why. Suppose I say I have a magical unicorn in my bedroom: you might not be able to check whether or not it's magic, but you can sure as shit check my bedroom to see if it's even there to begin with.

He's comparing the amount of social backlash (which also goes against you claim that it's more accepted than fat fetishism), not the health implications. Last I checked fat people aren't murdered by intolerant bigots for simply being fat, or liking being fat. It's pretty disturbing if you can't see the difference between the two.

I sort of agree with this, but it doesn't mean he can't ask any questions. Anyway, it's somewhat true that sex change operations can present health risks, perhaps on par with obesity (although both are too nebulous to really quantify). Obesity, however, can be 'fixed' whereas both physical changes and the underlying mental dissonance of transgenderism is with you for life. So as with above, I find the comparison between the two to be irksome. Transgenderism is also more than just a sexual fetish. Although I would actually argue, having been in this community for some years now, that a lot of feedees do show characteristics of dysmorphia that are comparable to transgender people. That fact is probably under-appreciated by the rest of the world, because (unlike with transgenderism) feedists can hide the fact that what they do is intentional. Also, there's a big difference between just any old fat person, and a fat fetishist. Yes, many people are overweight, but most of them don't like being that way. They have, somewhat understandably, no desire to celebrate it or strive for 'more acceptance'. So its only the die-hard feedists who can really be compared, even loosely. And they're not very numerous. As for being a 'mental disorder', it's just semantics. Being left-handed was a mental disorder once. There's no actual biological reason that one sexual practice be a disorder and another not, aside from how unpopular or immoral it is.

And your post differs how, exactly?

Some girls would differ.

Ack, I'll take the thin version.

Why would you assume that a male's reasons for liking it would be different to yours? I don't understand this weight gain schadenfreude at any rate, so I'm just here out of curiosity.

You can make a modest living, and truth be told the time investment is extremely small - there's no sensible reason for it to take more than 4-5 hours per week, maybe 8 if you have both a site and C4S. However it doesn't really scale up, so if you make X amount at 5 hours a week you probably won't make 8X at 40 hours. The reason most girls fail is they don't know what platforms to use, how to advertise their content or what sort of content sells. But if you're smart you can make a few hundred bucks a week from a few hours on C4S, up to maybe another 500 if you start with a known site such as BC or S31.

Could one not masturbate and eat at the same time, thus appeasing both schools? A new genre has been born.

Thing is, I agree entirely. I'm not one to disclose much of my private life, but I've been with a girl who was (still is) a model 'round these parts. The shit they get from creeps on a near-daily basis is truly horrendous and completely unilateral. But I don't think what you've said really concerns most of the situations described in this thread. If you create a profile on a fetish site for the purpose of soliciting customers, then you should expect that that's how people are going to interact with you on that profile. And really, if you can't deal with the mere fact that people are getting off to your content (which is section 1.A of the sex working guidebook) then the fault's kind of on your end. True, there's no end of male creeps who don't respect boundaries and say the most bone-chillingly weird things. But there's also an element of double-speak that some people engage in to justify being a sex worker, which effectively results in them deluding themselves about what they're doing and then chaffing from their own cognitive dissonance.

I assume you're referring to the scenario I described, at least in part. If so, we're all exposed to situations that differ depending upon what we choose to do. If someone chooses to be a web model and to advertise her services on a fetish site, then in the context of that fetish site she should expect people to approach her as a fetish model. It mightn't be the highlight of her day, but if she's a sex worker then some people might occasionally choose to bring up things relating to that subject, that wouldn't be appropriate in other circumstances. The job exists precisely because people in the everyday world don't accommodate those interests. That's not to say that I don't think it's weird to say to a model, "I wank to your pics," but it definitely falls into the 'just part of the job' category. Anyway it's good to see you're still alive.

I bet he eats pieces of shit like you for breakfast.

I'll sanction this necropost, because I too wanna know.

I saw a real classic today on F e a b i e, actually. A pay-site model - who usually seems to spend most of her time fishing for subscribers - got butthurt over the fact that someone told her they've used her pictures for masturbation, and threatened to take her content down. Like, that's literally your fucking job, sweetheart.

I realized recently that, when on Tumblr, I subconsciously developed a way of slightly diverting my gaze to the left of my monitor and de-focusing, so that I can scroll through Tumblr posts with just enough clarity to identify appealing images, but without having to read anything on there. Out of sight out of mind, as they say.