Jump to content

SallyLovesJane

Members
  • Posts

    22
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by SallyLovesJane

  1. Just having a laugh mate. Don't take it so seriously... 🙂
  2. You'd be watching that content if it existed though, wouldn't you... 😉 I know I would. Perhaps that's why women don't go near me either 😄
  3. She did bare all for a couple of sets at the top of her career, which can be found for free with a quick search. Unfortunately - from the point of view of we lovers of the curve - she was powerful thin at the time. Still red hot beautiful, but less of her to enjoy! I suppose that's not something she was comfortable with, as she never did it again. I'd be lying if I said I didn't wish she'd shown a little more from time to time, but at the end of the day it's her body, her choice. I suppose we can assume she's been asked more than once to strip bare again (of course she did go starkers in some of her more recent shoots, but judicious crossing of the legs/camera angle/hand position preserved her modesty). Hopefully it says something positive about the modern world that she carved a successful career on her own terms. In an OnlyFans world, where anyone can do anything in front of a webcam, it's perhaps a rarity that the classic 'Page 3' model remains intact, let alone profitable.
  4. There's a new set appeared at MCG. https://maycontaingirl.com/ I don't currently have a supscription, but she looks great in the promo shot 😀
  5. The MCG team are keen to pass themselves off as 'proper' glamour photographers, and whilst it would be naive to assume there's zero re-touching going on, I'm of the opinion they keep it to a bare minimum. After all, if you're a decent photographer with the correct gear and the knowledge to use it, there's no actual need to re-touch. The quality of their output is head and shoulders above a lot of the overlit rubbish which passes for glamour these days. The certainly show off Lucy in her best light, a shame she doesn't work with them more often.
  6. I'll have to check the old Zoo shoots out, I may have them in my archive. I'm assuming the photoshopping of pics posted here is done by overzealous fans (a little wish fulfillment), whereas the Zoo shots would be 'shopped in house? It's hard to imagine anyone attached to Lucy in an offical capacity having the balls to try to pass them of as genuine!
  7. It doesn't take a genius to spot the fact that this image has been rather crudely photoshopped, like a good many more here. As discussed above, the MCG shoot probably dates from the back end of 2022. She does look absolutely stunning in this set, but I prefer her with her head in proportion to her body...🤣
  8. For sure. Photographers shooting a half dozen sets in a single day is as old as the hills, and makes perfect sense from a supply point of view. From the demand side of the coin I guess we don't think to much about the when or where, but just accept that fresh content appears in a fairly regular manner. I also think the most recent MCG sets were all shot in the back end of 2022, presumably not long before the 'Zips' shoot was issued. 2 films followed, plus a pair of 'Art Shoots' and most recently the set of her in the orange bathing costume*. Annoyingly, I think she's looking her absolute best in these sets. Her body size and shape is (imho) as close to ideal as can be hoped for, plus she's showing a little age in the face which suits her well. I may be imagining things but I fancy she did something to inflate her lips for a while - a look which turns me right off - whatever she'd done she has undone, and looks like her old self again. Only bigger, older and sexier. But of course these are images which could be six months old; or older. Their relevancy is questionable, at best. But yes, I do wish she'd either commit to the next stage of her career or bow out before she offends everyone whio's followed her and would like to see more.
  9. They seem to be up and running again, I recently bought a monthly pass. They operate a tier system through **, ranging form circa £15 per month pounds quid for access to their archives to £too much for access to everything. I paid for a teir 2 subscription which accesses all archive sets/vids, plus any new sets/vids released for the duration of the subscription. I intend to mine everything I want over the coming weeks and cancel before the sub renews. I paid for the sub mainly to access Lucy's content, quite a lot of which I had not seen. There are a few other girls on their books I like too so I feel it's value for money, for a single month. I genuinely like MCG's style. I'm old enough to remember 'glamour' photography from before it went all starkly lit and digital. MCG has a hint of class you don't see too often these days. I don't often pay money for porn (who needs to these days. Part of the problem, I suspect) but I'm not sorry I shelled out a few coins on this occasion. The vibe of the site suggests they are a dynamic, going concern, but as a word of caution I'm not sure the recent Lucy sets are as new as they claim. The most recent 4 or 5 sets posted could have been shot on the same day (who knows when) and drip fed over the months. Some of them were shot at the same location, which is not a new concept, but a little worrying when the shootee seems to have cold feet. Anyway, whichever way you cut it, with Lucy it feels like an endgame is in sight. I just wish she'd make up her mind.
  10. True enough. I'd expect getting your baps out for the camera could be a lot of fun when you're in your 20's, but it might wear a little thin after a while. There are plenty of examples of models who've kept on going well into their 30's or 40's though, although arugably some of them should have quit while they were ahead. Whilst a lot of casual fans may have turned off when she got all nice and curvy, I would have thought Lucy would have enough dedicated fans to make it worth her while sticking with it, if that's what she wants to do. It's a shame she can't seem to make her mind up one way or the other. Also, I wonder why she does fewer 'professional' shoots with MCG/NBC/etc. Surely the demand is still there, but again, no content. How very frustrating😀
  11. Does anyone have a clear idea of where Lucy is going with her career at present? No calendar this year, which is not only a disappointment but a worrying sign of a more general lack of presence. On top of that, the platforms she does still use display a similar lack of content, with what little content she posts generally being of a comparitively low quality. There's a new(ish) set at MayContainGirl: https://maycontaingirl.com/2023/02/17/lucy-vixen-lorange/ in which she's looking stunning. But, If she's not posing for a calendar, how come she's posing for MCG? I would happily pay for an OnlyFans subscription, but universal opinion seems to be that it's a waste of money. Fair play to her if she's moving on from modelling, but it would be nice to have some consistency... Are there any platforms where she still posts in a way which suggests she gives a sh*t?
  12. Agreed - what essentially amounts to a honey bukkake - I think this may be the sexiest thing she's done to date. Love seeing her in the buff too. The lighting and 'tastefully' crossed thighs prevent us from getting a really good look the part least seen, but that almost makes it sexier. I wonder if this and her previous MCG shoot point to more full frontal work in the future? I would think she's at a crossroads in her career about now. A lot of girls get out long before they hit 30, if she means to continue she may have to consider broadening her horizons, by which I do mean spreading her legs..😄 I get the sense her onlyfans/instagram/etc output is less than stellar, these sets/vids with professionals are - for my money - where she looks her best.
  13. It absolutely is worth the wait. I had a look at the two hosts tsk suggested, but they both wanted me to register and frankly, I couldn't be arsed 😄 The link I posted is not my own, I found it at VEF. It took 2 or 3 hours (not sure exactly, as I left it downloading while I went to the pub) but I had a pleasant half hours viewing lined up on my return... I've had some success with anonfile in the past. I'll try hosting there. Edit: Hopefully this will be a little quicker. https://anonfiles.com/l5Z4u7v7yc/LucyVixen_LoveHoney_mp4
  14. Haha... Some people are never happy! You're right though, this link is dinosaural. Suggest me a superior host and I'll re-post.
  15. Her latest MCG vid... https://k2s.cc/file/4e005ac38b88d/ It's a beauty!
  16. Her new MCG vid is the hottes thing she's done yet. Are there any rules against my posting a link here?
  17. I've heard nothing to that effect, but I don't suppose it's something she might advertise. That said - although that top is indeed doing a Herculean job of supporting her assets - they don't look the least bit tampered with to me. Plenty of natural sag on display to my well practiced eye... 😉
  18. She released a new set with MCG earlier this month. For my money she's back to her stunning best! She also comes as close as I've seen to going full frontal as she has since her fully bare set right at the start of her career. Fingers crossed it's a sign of better things to come. We can dream anyway...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.