JackOfAll
Members-
Posts
123 -
Joined
-
Last visited
JackOfAll's Achievements
-
dania201 reacted to a post in a topic: Disordered eating policies
-
Here is a snippet from one of the sites in question: "Disordered eating Promoting, normalizing, providing instructional advice about, coordinating, or otherwise glorifying disordered eating, feederism, or related topics is prohibited on this site. Examples of disordered eating works include, but are not limited to: extreme low-calorie diets, imagery of someone making themselves vomit, and imagery focused on ribs, thigh gaps, concave stomachs, and so forth. Examples of feederism works include, but are not limited to: force feeding (consensual or nonconsensual), using illegal or controlled substances to achieve weight gain, using devices to fill the stomach, and so forth. Works involving disordered eating, feederism, and related topics that have a community support or educational focus, are part of a greater narrative, or are otherwise contextualized in a manner that abides by this site's guidelines are permitted. Also permitted are works that promote body positivity, eating competitions, medical surgeries, and health, fitness, or lifestyle works."
-
Multiple sites which will not show up if I type them in. One starts with a P, another with a L, another with an O, another with an M, and one with a C. I'm sure there are plenty which aren't adopting these policies, but I've received emails or notifications from most of the ones I haunt/frequent/lurk on. I also know Google, YouTube, Microsoft, Facebook, and all their subsidiary companies used for social media purposes are committing to adopting these policies. The companies have all recently released new terms of service in first quarter of this year.
-
JackOfAll reacted to a post in a topic: Fetish Frustrations
-
JackOfAll reacted to a post in a topic: Fetish Frustrations
-
JackOfAll reacted to a post in a topic: Fetish Frustrations
-
Dreamgirl29 reacted to a post in a topic: Disordered eating policies
-
Beyond that, I have no idea. I just know that sites have sent out policy changes or have made notes about upcoming updates to policies.
-
Many states in the USA are making policy changes. I think there are also policies floating through the EU as well, but I'm not as up to date on those.
-
Many sites are now implementing, or will be implementing by the end of this quarter, policies which will ban/remove or severely restrict people from getting paid or being funded for any activities which fall under 'disordered eating'. This includes force feeding, stuffing, weight gain, and so forth. Pretty much everything to do with feederism, feedism, etc will be against those policies to post. It also includes all other eating disorders and imagery around them as well. Anything which could or would constitute disordered eating or self harm of any kind, whether consensual or not. This includes all social media sites, the many of the various fans sites, and most places where artists or models are paid to produce works. There are very few places on the web where this policy won't be put in place...
-
She is and always was a fake gainer. She was massively pregnant, and is using backed dated images and videos to fill out her catalog.
-
Despairado reacted to a post in a topic: Candids Section - Should It Be Gone?
-
She's slimmed down quite a bit. We now know how much that old poll mattered. Hopefully she's happier now catering to her old audience.
-
FA2 reacted to a post in a topic: Mal Malloy (MAEBH17)
-
Colmillo reacted to a post in a topic: Mal Malloy (MAEBH17)
-
fatowl reacted to a post in a topic: Is the feedism 'community' becoming too commercial and impersonal?
-
JackOfAll reacted to a post in a topic: Is the feedism 'community' becoming too commercial and impersonal?
-
JackOfAll reacted to a post in a topic: Is the feedism 'community' becoming too commercial and impersonal?
-
Thebbwbbw reacted to a post in a topic: Candids gone because of whining users
-
JackOfAll reacted to a post in a topic: Evie Greyy's Artwork!❤️
-
Candids gone because of whining users
JackOfAll replied to MuscleCarz88's topic in Serious Discussion
This site should close down sections with pictures that aren't consented to. That includes the entire Curvy Women are Beautiful section. Once that section is gone we'd be able to see what remains. -
Short answer, yes it is. It has been like this for a decade or more. Long answer... Compared to most of the existing sites out there, Curvage is a decent community that exists because of the continued support of the paid portions of this site. Without the sale of clips and revenues, Curvage likely would have to fall back on other methods to pay for itself. Compared to it's former self, Curvage is worlds different and objectively better than it was back in the day. Less creepy, less abrasive. Compared to the communities that existed two decades ago, this community is a pale shadow of the places that existed back then. There were a lot of communities that were free to join, with admins and moderators who cared a great deal about the integrity of their communities and did it because they wanted a place to meet other people like them. Places you could meet people, date them, chat about a lot of subjects and be treated respectfully. It was never perfect, but there were nice places for dating and community out there. That isn't to say there weren't creeps and pay site models back then, but it was a different paradigm. There were far worse places than there are today back then as well. Whole sites of creepy shit. It is just become more centered around monetary needs now. A lot of models sell clips for the money and don't care about the community. That is what it is. It is like that everywhere. The community (Curvage and beyond) will never be what it was. Honestly, if you like curvy or plush women who are not truly obese, then you'd have better luck with other communities. If you are looking for truly fat women, there are few places that I know of anymore that don't involve the commerical aspects. Curvage is one of the better ones. That being said, you'd have better luck on the dating side on dating sites. So, yeah.
-
JackOfAll reacted to a post in a topic: Evie Greyy 🔥 NEW MODEL!🔥
-
Candiifan reacted to a post in a topic: Candids Section - Should It Be Gone?
-
Avataг reacted to a post in a topic: Candids Section - Should It Be Gone?
-
raisingcanes183 reacted to a post in a topic: Candids Section - Should It Be Gone?
-
JackOfAll reacted to a post in a topic: Candids Section - Should It Be Gone?
-
Can this be pinned?
-
JackOfAll reacted to a post in a topic: Candids Section - Should It Be Gone?
-
If the Candids forum is non-consensual, so is the rest of the Curvy Women are Beautiful section. It would be better if the entire Curvy Women are Beautiful section was removed. None of the pictures or videos in the entire area are consensual. The Your Curvy Women Arts should also be taken down, as a good portion of that is posting other people's art without consent. If we're talking about taking down everything that is not consented to by someone, there would need to be a massive purge of the site. All that would remain is portions of some sections and all the paid content. It would leave Curvage a shell, but it'd all be temporarily consensual. Until someone says or does something non-consensual...then we'd have to take that down too.
-
Yes, let's be happy for the guy who gets to see what the vast majority of the people on this thread pay money to see, for free, daily, whenever he wants. Who gets to do anything consensual to the body that so many of you desire. Cheers to the guy who got the girl on his own merits and enjoys it all. Who had the guts and gumption to get who he desired instead of throwing away money on something he'll never obtain. May we all be so lucky.
-
I’ve Grown SO Huge!!! Update!
JackOfAll reviewed HoneyBun_TV's file in Video Clips - Stuffing/Eating